This is an archive of my Blog from 2007. The posts are presented in format as they were published.
Monday, April 14, 2014
Russian IPOs – Changing Perception of Audit
THIS
POST WAS ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED MARCH 09, 2007
Russian
IPOs – Changing Perception of Audit
During
my last five years working with the Russian companies, one of the most delicate
issues was the necessity to present an audit statement according to
international standards. This was the major obstacle in ANY transaction,
besides usual stuff (like consolidation, both legal and financial).
This
week KOMMERSANT BUSINESS GUIDE
featured “Financial Reporting” and has some nice numbers. I wrote earlier about
EXPERT-RA ratings. Now KOMMERSANT adds to earlier reported facts:
- Ernst & Young has 21% of the surveyed
companies and is oriented towards the ones that are controlled by the
government
- KPMG and PWC like any sector and
ownership
- out of
13 biggest companies in Russia – 10 use IFRS reporting, while oil, telecoms and
metallurgy companies use US GAAP
- the
Russian companies that are getting ready for IPO try to shorten preparation
time for audit opinion (e.g. ROSNEFT cut short the time by 40 days)
-
gradually the time for release of annual audit opinion are shifting towards the
first quarter of the year, as opposed to the 1H earlier.
When
speaking about the whole picture, auditing was the prerogative of the BIG FIVE
(changed later to BIG FOUR), and this was the only feasible solution for any
Russian company that was involved in fundraising with foreign investors. Yes,
this was a tedious task to persuade the owners to allocate funds for the audit.
BIG players were not very timid in their pricing. A couple of years ago, a
typical BIG auditing company asked for about $70K -$90K for the annual audit
and that might take as long as 150-250 days. While these numbers are not
drastically changed right now, we have more and more opportunities.
Now we
see a number of Russian accounting companies that are members of international
auditing chains (BKR, DFK - just to name a few of them).
This
changes the picture drastically.
The
Russian accounting companies can make a highly qualified audit of their Russian
clients, at the same time they may stamp their opinion by their peer of one of
the international chains. Why it is so good?
- the
Russian companies (especially the ones that are existing for long) have a solid
background in auditing domestic companies
- they
do the job much quicker and with (in some cases) higher quality than their BIG
peers (everyone knows here that the BIG players assign to a routine audit the
novices, the ones that are less experienced, and then they just stamp their
opinions)
- and of
course – expenses – they differ
So, in
our day-to-day operations the clients find it very very practical to use the
Russian firm, rather then spent money on the BIG. I am working for a number of
years with a couple of such Russian firms (e.g. BKR-INTERKOM-AUDIT ) which do
excellent job and satisfy all the required needs.
So, I
guess that we now witness a gradual shift from the BIG to domestic auditors. As
one of the owners complained to me recently: “Well I asked one of the BIGs – we
need to stand in line for about three months, pay a lot and them wait another
three months for the results. This is no good.”
Labels:
Ernst & Young,
GAAP,
IFRC,
INVESTMENTS IN RUSSIA,
IPO,
KPMG,
PwC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment